Abstract
Madrasa education is a compelling issue in a Muslim minority country like the Philippines.
Amidst the rapid pace of modernization, secular education enjoys strong government support,
while Islamic teaching often remains underemphasized. However, the madrasa education
system in the Philippines has begun to make positive strides through mutual learning and
exchanging experiences with neighboring countries, such as Indonesia. Likewise, the present
intensive and participatory assistantship program aimed to elucidate the efforts to promote
religious moderation and enhance the educational quality within selected madrasas in
Mindanao, the Philippines. The Participatory Action Research (PAR) method, combined
with direct mentoring, was employed in this endeavor. Furthermore, the program was designed
to address three key objectives: (1) strengthening religious moderation within madrasa
education, (2) preparing professional teachers for madrasa education, and (3) enhancing the
management of madrasa education. In summary, the outcomes of this program have the
potential to contribute to the adoption of the Indonesian Islamic education model within the
Muslim community in the Philippines.
Introduction
Madrasa (Islamic school), or madaris in Arabic, is believed to have
existed in the Philippines since the arrival of Islam in the country. It was
initially introduced by Muslim missionaries from the Arabian and Malay
Peninsula, who settled in Sulu and Western Mindanao around the
thirteenth century. During its early years, Islamic education was
conducted in teachers' homes, known as pandito or guro, and sometimes
in mosques. The curriculum primarily focused on Arabic reading and
writing, as well as the Quran (Bakar, 1983: 94). Recently, madrasa
education has spread to many regions in the Philippines, primarily on
Mindanao Island. It is estimated that there are approximately 600 to
1,000 madrasas in the Mindanao area, catering to 60,000 to 100,000
students (Program, n.d.). However, madrasa education in the
Philippines encounters significant challenges.
The primary issue regarding madrasa education in Mindanao and
the Philippines today is the absence of a precise and standardized
Islamic education curriculum in the face of global challenges (Noor et
al., 2007: 21). While general or secular education in the Philippines
obtains substantial government support and modernization, Islamic
education often takes a backseat. This disparity has led to dissatisfaction
and frustration within the Muslim community, who feel compelled to
accept a secular education curriculum that does not align with their
Bangsamoro Muslim identity (Ali, 2012: 13). On a broader scale, the
lack of understanding between the Philippines government and the
Muslim community in Mindanao regarding educational curriculum
regulation has also contributed to the emergence of radical movements
(Cayamodin, 2019: 88-102).
The Philippines government has addressed these challenges by
preparing an educational development roadmap for Muslim students
(Murtadlo, 2015: 45-60). It includes offering Arabic instruction in public
schools that cater to Muslim students and institutionalizing madrasa
education through DepEd Order No. 51, s. 2004, which outlines the
Standard Curriculum for Public Elementary Schools and Private Madrasa (Sali, 2021: 163-185). Despite these efforts, a significant
dichotomy persists between Islamic and secular courses within the
Philippines education system. In this regard, religious studies are
primarily pursued in madrasas, while general sciences are taught in
public schools. This division in desirable learning paths has created an
identity dilemma for Muslims, forcing them to choose between
maintaining Islamic teachings offered in madrasas or adhering to the
secular curriculum provided by the government (Kulidtod, 2017: 92-
102).
Madrasa education in the Philippines has made strides through
collaborative learning and exchanging experiences with neighboring
countries like Indonesia (Jppn.com, 2010). Despite differing historical
backgrounds, Indonesia's madrasa education system, which integrates
religious studies and general sciences into a standardized curriculum,
serves as a valuable reference Mindanao and the Philippines. This model
has successfully enhanced the quality of the Muslim generation,
enabling them to play positive roles in various aspects of national life
while maintaining their devout Muslim and nationalist identities.
Method and Strategies
This community service program (PkM) employed Participatory
Action Research (PAR), which involved the participation and leadership
of individuals directly experiencing issues. In this regard, they take
action to instigate emancipatory social change by conducting systematic
research to generate new knowledge (Flora Cornish, 2023). Moreover,
PAR represents an action grounded in scientific inquiry to effect
change, guide, and improve conditions within specific groups
(Nofiyanti, 2020). The method in question aims not only to contribute
to the construction of knowledge but also to promote social
transformation (Nelson, 2014). The program's activities included an
intensive and participatory assistantship from January 23 to 26, 2023,
targeting two madrasas in Davao City, specifically Wisdom Islamic
School (WIS) and Eastern Mindanao Islamic Academy (EMIA).
Previously, on April 5 and 6, 2019, the team conducted a seminar on the
madrasa curriculum at Mindanao State University (MSU) in General
Santos City, attended by madrasa practitioners and teachers. During the
assistantship program, the team prepared handouts, conducted followup actions, and disseminated results. The approach utilized in this
program was asset-based community development, aimed at enhancing
the quality of madrasa education by identifying its strengths and
potential. In this agenda, educators from the assisted madrasas
organized around the issue of educational quality improvement and
were subsequently guided toward concrete actions to expedite positive
changes.
Furthermore, the strategies employed to achieve the expected
outcomes included:
• Conducting intensive communication with the Embassy of the
Republic of Indonesia in the Philippines, liaising through the
Consulate General of the Republic of Indonesia in Davao City and
the Educational and Cultural Attaché regarding permits;
• Completing initial focus group discussions (FGD) by the team to
formulate the design of the assistantship program;
• Holding FGDs with the team and experts from Mindanao State
University (MSU) in General Santos City;
• Implementing the program with a focus on management and
teachers’ capacity building through FGDs and field assistantships;
• Evaluating the assistantship program;
• Facilitating dissemination and follow-up actions.
Figure 1.
A photo session with the Consulate General of the Republic of Indonesia in
Davao City after the consultation
A presentation session during the dissemination
Condition of madrasa education in general
The condition of madrasa education in Mindanao is described as
follows:
1. Curriculum
In Mindanao, the Philippines, madrasa education lacked a
precise and standardized curriculum. This situation led to ineffective
instructional activities as courses were often redundantly taught
across various grade levels. Consequently, madrasas did not meet
quality standards, primarily because the curriculum was dominated
by the teaching of Arabic and the reading and writing of the Quran
(Hamid, 2022: 35-47; Latif, 2014: 70-83; Sali, 2020: 201-217).
2. Teacher Quality
The quality of madrasa teachers in Mindanao, the Philippines,
required significant improvement to prepare students to be
competitive. Teachers, especially in weekend madrasas, were typically
recruited from local communities based more on personal
connections or recommendations than professional qualifications
(Hamid, 2022: 35-47; Latif, 2014: 70-83; Sali, 2020: 201-217).
3. Facility and Management
The facilities and management of madrasas in Mindanao, the
Philippines, were suboptimal. Learning spaces were often
inadequate, and madrasas were likely managed based on ad hoc
decisions rather than strategic planning, lacking clear objectives
(Hamid, 2022: 35-47; Latif, 2014: 70-83; Sali, 2020: 201-217).
4. Funding
Financial challenges were acute for madrasas in Mindanao, the
Philippines. In this regard, the government did not contribute
financially to madrasa education, leaving them reliant on community
contributions and foreign aid (Hamid, 2022: 35-47; Latif, 2014: 70-
83; Sali, 2020: 201-217).
5. Self-dependence
Operating under secular governance, madrasa education in
Mindanao was compelled to independently seek funding for its
developmental programs, often relying on donations from Muslim majority countries. This approach was partly due to the moderate
economic standing of most Muslim communities in the Philippines
(Hamid, 2022: 35-47; Latif, 2014: 70-83; Sali, 2020: 201-217).
Assistantship activities
The activities conducted during the assistantship program are
described as follows:
1. FGD and field assistantship at Wisdom Islamic School (WIS)
Wisdom Islamic School adheres to the Philippines’
Department of Education (DepEd) K-12 Basic Education
Curriculum, augmented with integrated Islamic values. For Islamic
Studies, the elementary level utilizes the DepEd’s Refined
Elementary Madrasa Curriculum (REMC), while the secondary level
is tailored to the school’s unique curriculum. Islamic subjects at the
school encompass the study of the Quran, hadith, Arabic language,
aqida (Islamic creeds), fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), and Sirah
(prophetic history), each adapted to students’ varying levels of
knowledge and comprehension. The school diligently ensures that
the content delivered is consistent with and based on the Quran and
the Sunnah.
During the visit to Wisdom Islamic School (WIS), the team
undertook two primary activities: a focus group discussion (FGD)
and a field assistantship. WIS teachers and administrators attended
the FGD in one of the school’s conducive classrooms. In the
process, the team expounded on religious moderation as a
foundation for instructional activities in madrasa education. It
showcased the curriculum used in Indonesian madrasas, the history,
the distinct features differentiating pesantren (Islamic boarding
school) from madrasa (Islamic school), and the curriculum design for madrasa education. The field assistantship involved observing
classroom dynamics and school facilities, fostering direct
interactions and dialogues with students, teachers, and school
authorities.
The team elucidated that the madrasa education model in
Indonesia emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It was
initiated by reformers in Islamic education who advocated it as a
'middle way' between the traditional pesantren model and the Western influenced school model. The impetus for this reform stemmed
from two key factors: internally, the underdevelopment and
marginalization of the Indonesian Muslim community in education
propelled Muslim elites to instigate educational reforms; externally,
the influence of Indonesian students returning from studies abroad,
particularly from Middle Eastern countries, sparked a movement for
change. The reform led to the madrasa model of Islamic education
focusing on four main objectives: (1) integrating secular subjects
with religious studies; (2) adopting modern instructional
methodologies; (3) implementing a structured class system rather
than based solely on the complexity of religious texts; and (4)
applying contemporary education management practices.
After the FGD, Dr. H. Muhlisin, M.Ag., the team leader,
highlighted the parallels between Wisdom Islamic School (WIS) in
Davao City and formal madrasa education in Indonesia, represented
by Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI), Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs), and Madrasah
Aliyah (MA). He noted that WIS in Davao City has a twelve-grade
system akin to Indonesia's formal madrasa education, which
integrates general and Islamic subjects. However, he pointed out that
Madrasah Aliyah (Islamic Senior High School) in Indonesia offers
various majors, including science, social studies, and languages. The
team's goal in the Philippines was to introduce the structure and
content of Indonesia's formal madrasa curriculum to the
participants.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Interaction with teachers and students at Wisdom Islamic School (WIS)
A presentation to some teachers and students
2. FGD and field assistantship at Eastern Mindanao Islamic Academy Eastern Mindanao Islamic Academy (EMIA) is a traditional madrasa that operates only during the weekends, on Saturdays and Sundays. EMIA focuses on Islamic subjects while including certain non-Islamic subjects (mathematics and science), specifically for the lower grades. The majority of the students are day scholars. They arrive in the morning and leave in the afternoon each weekend. The graduates can only continue their higher-level studies if they attend formal education in the Philippine public schools. In this regard, EMIA serves Muslim students who expect to study Islam while continuing their education in public schools. Consequently, EMIA needs to establish a solid partnership with government schools (Deporos et al., 2021: 165-174). Additionally, EMIA provides dormitories for students who choose to reside at the school to memorize the Quran and master the Arabic language. During the visit to EMIA in Davao City, the community service team noted that the educational system bears similarities to the Madrasah Diniyah Takmiliyah (MDT) in Indonesia. MDT is a nonformal educational program that offers complementary Islamic education for students enrolled in public schools. It has three levels: awaliyah (elementary) with a study period of six years, wustha (junior secondary) with a study period of three years, and ulya (senior secondary) also with a study period of three years. However, unlike EMIA, MDT is held from approximately 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. and mandates a minimum of 18 weekly lesson hours. It provides additional education to augment the Islamic studies provided by Indonesian public schools, which allocate only two hours per week. Like the early madrasas in Mindanao, MDT in Indonesia has a long-standing history, emerging concurrently with the period of Islamic da'wah in the archipelago. During that era, Islamic education was integrated smoothly into the local community through an acculturation process tailored to their needs. Throughout the colonial period, almost every village with a Muslim population had some form of madrasah diniyah (Madrasah Diniyah Takmiliah), known by various names such as pengajian, surau, rangkang, sekolah agama, and others. The curriculum generally included subjects like aqidah (Islamic creeds), ibadah (Islamic worship), akhlaq (Islamic ethics), Quranic reading, and the Arabic language. However, in the global era, MDT’s relevance has dwindled due to diminished attention from the community and the government. In the FGD at EMIA, Dr. Muhlisin, M.Ag., emphasized that the primary consideration in any educational program should be the education of the next generation. A well-lived and well-educated life has the potential to lead a nation to greatness over the long term. However, he highlighted that the most vital form of intelligence relates to spirituality. Spiritual intelligence is a determinant in gauging the morality of a nation. Hence, it is insufficient to rely solely on formal education, such as elementary and secondary schools. In this context, both Weekend Madrasas in the Philippines and MDT in Indonesia provide alternative avenues to develop and strengthen religious education in formal educational institutions.
Figure 5.
A discussion session with teachers and administrators at Eastern Mindanao Islamic
Academy (EMIA)
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
A photo session with some students at Eastern Mindanao Islamic Academy
(EMIA)
The seminar and mentoring forum conducted at Mindanao
State University (MSU) in General Santos City provided an
opportunity to exchange experiences regarding the implementation
of policies for capacity building among madrasa teachers. The goal
of these activities was for madrasa representatives to gain insights
and motivation to develop their competencies, ultimately improving
the quality of madrasa education. Approximately 20 to 25
practitioners and teachers from various madrasas in the Mindanao
region, particularly from General Santos City, attended the event.
The MSU forum spanned two days, comprising a seminar on the first
day and a mentoring program on the second.
During the seminar, two main topics were discussed: the
composition of subjects in formal madrasa education and the
pedagogical strategies used in madrasas. The presenters noted that
in Indonesia, the initial step toward integrating madrasa and general education systems was the issuance of a joint decree (SKB) by the
Ministry of Education and Culture (MoEC), the Ministry of
Religious Affairs (MoRA), and the Ministry of Home Affairs. This
decree mandated that madrasas dedicate 30% of their curriculum to
the MoEC’s general education subjects. Furthermore, the SKB
specified that while MoRA managed MI, MTs, and MA, their
curriculum would be integrated with the National Education
Curriculum. Additional provisions of the SKB included: (1) madrasa
degrees were to be regarded as equivalent to general school degrees
at corresponding levels; (2) madrasa graduates were eligible for
further studies in general schools; and (3) madrasa students were
allowed to transfer to general schools at the same educational level.
Subsequently, Law 8/1989 on Education established a formal
nexus between the MoRA and MoEC, reversing the curriculum ratio
to 70% in line with the general education curriculum. This ratio
remained at least until 1998. The enactment of Law 25/1999 on
fiscal decentralization and Law 22/1999 on regional governance
transferred control and financial responsibility of schools to district
governments in 1999. Afterward, in 2001, management of
elementary and secondary education, inclusive of 1.6 million
instructors and numerous assets, was delegated to the districts.
However, the Law upheld the central government's jurisdiction over
religious education, keeping madrasa education under the auspices
of MoRA. In mid-2003, President Megawati authorized a new
National Education System Law.
Figure 8.
Mentoring session at Mindanao State University (MSU) in General Santos City
Islam and madrasa education in the Philippines
According to historical records, the introduction of Islam into the
Philippines via the Mindanao and Sulu routes was multifaceted.
Following the death of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), Islam spread to
various parts of the world, including the Middle East, Central Asia,
North Africa, Eastern Europe, and Southeast Asia, notably to the Sulu
Archipelago and Mindanao. The dissemination of Islam in these
regions occurred through different means: da'wah by Muslim
missionaries, conquest, or a combination of both. In Mindanao and
Sulu, Islam was introduced through trade routes from Arabia to Central
Asia, then to India and China, eventually reaching Southeast Asia.
Muslim traders and teachers, particularly the Sufis, played a pivotal role
in this process (Gamon, n.d.).
Majul posits that the advent of Islam in the Philippines resulted
from the Filipino’s engagement in international trade during the ninth
century, notably with countries like Morocco and China. This trade
witnessed participation from numerous Muslim traders from diverse
nations, with Arab Muslims predominantly at the forefront. By the
fourteenth century, many foreign Muslim inhabitants had made the Sulu
region their home. Initially arriving for trade purposes, many married
local women and chose to remain in Sulu permanently. The Islamization
of the Philippines is believed to have strong links with the similar
movements in Indonesia and Malaysia (Majul, 1977).
Islamic education in the Philippines, commonly referred to as
madrasa education, emphasizes religious teachings and values. The
inception of madrasa education can be traced back to the arrival of
Islam in Sulu in the thirteenth century. Following the Islamization of
Sulu, majlis, or special gatherings focused on the writing and reading of
the Quran, started to develop. These gatherings eventually evolved into
more formalized institutions known as madrasas, in which courses on
religion, such as Arabic language, theology, Islamic history, and Islamic
jurisprudence, were taught. As the Muslim population in the region grew, madrasas expanded to include primary and secondary education
levels.
The advent of Western colonizers and the introduction of secular
education led to a marked decrease in madrasa enrolments, as these
institutions struggled to compete with the secular education system,
which was backed by the colonial government (Bakar, 2011: 75-89).
Muslims perceived the schools established by the American colonizers
as platforms promoting Christianity and as a threat to Islamic teachings
(Hefner, 2009). In this context, it was reported that the American
educators sent to Philippine schools were predominantly Protestant
Christians (Miller, 1982: 26-27). Consequently, many Muslims in the
Philippines were reluctant to send their children to public schools,
steadfast in their belief that madrasa education was the appropriate
educational pathway for Muslim children (Isidro, 1980: 54).
Characteristics and challenges of madrasa education
Lingga (2004) explains that after the Philippines’ independence
from America in 1946, Sulu and Mindanao gradually strengthened their
relationship with some Arab countries. This notion began when Muslim
students from Mindanao were accepted to study at Al-Azhar University
in Egypt. Many of them also received scholarships to pursue academic
degrees in the Middle East focused on Islamic studies. After completing
their education and returning home, these students served as Muslim
missionaries and established madrasa education and Quran schools,
contributing to the growth of the propagation of Islam in the
Philippines (Lingga, 2004: 1-14).
In general, there are three types of madrasas in the Philippines.
The first is the traditional or the weekend madrasa. It offers non-formal
education with the following characteristics: (a) classes are held on
Saturdays and Sundays or other days according to the agreement
between teachers and students; (b) they do not follow a formal
curriculum; (c) they do not employ a class system, so one learning group
may consist of students from different age groups; and (d) the teachers are typically madrasa graduates or imams. The government does not
recognize this type of madrasa because it does not adhere to the
Philippines’ national education curriculum (DepEd ALIVE, n.d.-b).
The second type is the formal or developmental madrasa. It
employs a class system similar to traditional public schools in the
Philippines, ranging from elementary to secondary levels. This type of
madrasa primarily focuses on religious studies and includes a few
general courses, such as mathematics and science, with Arabic language
as the medium of instruction. However, the formal madrasa does not
follow the curriculum set by the Department of Education of the
Philippines. Consequently, graduates cannot continue their studies to
higher levels in formal schools. Moreover, this madrasa is neither
accredited nor recognized by the Department of Education of the
Philippines (DepEd ALIVE, n.d.-b).
The third type is the standard or private madrasa. The private
madrasa has been recognized as a part of the Philippines’ national
education system through DepEd Order No. 51, s. 2004, which outlines
the Standard Curriculum for Elementary Public Schools and Private
Madrasa. This type of madrasa follows the standard curriculum set by
the Department of Education and is accredited and acknowledged by
the government. Nevertheless, it still includes Islamic studies and
Arabic language in its curriculum (DepEd ALIVE, n.d.-b).
Improving the quality of madrasa education
The improvement of madrasa education quality typically aims to
achieve two primary objectives: improving student achievement and
elevating the accreditation status of madrasas. This endeavor involves
at least three key aspects: 1) teacher professionalism, 2) madrasa
education management, and 3) learning facilities and media.
1. Improving teacher professionalism
The improvement in teacher professionalism has a profound
impact on the quality of madrasa education. Professional teachers
are known to create an engaging and enjoyable learning environment, facilitating the optimal execution of learning activities.
Furthermore, they significantly influence the development of
students' character values. Hence, madrasa education requires
professional educators who are qualified, trained, motivated, and
responsible. Effective learning can only transpire when teachers
fulfill their professional roles, impacting students’ performance and
achievements.
2. Implementing effective management
Madrasa education management is another pivotal aspect
contributing to quality improvement. In this regard, management
encompasses everything related to the control and organization of
the educational process to accomplish short-term, intermediate, or
long-term goals. It includes planning, implementation, and problem
analysis. Firstly, in the planning phase, the focus is on determining
how teaching programs should be conducted, including the
distribution of teachers and courses, provision of textbooks and
learning resources, development of laboratories and libraries, and
organization of curricular activities (Warsiyah et al., 2022: 115-132).
Secondly, the implementation phase incorporates strategies for
fostering quality madrasa education, such as program socialization,
SWOT analysis, problem-solving, quality enhancement, and
evaluation. Thirdly, problem analysis considers community
participation and economic conditions, as it can impact the quality
of madrasas. In essence, madrasa education management should
receive solid support from supervisors and principals to actualize the
anticipated improvement in education quality.
3. Enhancing learning facilities and media
Learning facilities and media are vital elements that warrant
substantial attention to elevate the quality of madrasa education.
They include all the facilities directly utilized in the educational
process. In this regard, madrasa education should offer learning
facilities and media that enable students to develop their talents and
abilities as exemplary human beings. To maximize the effectiveness, proper management is essential. Hence, it should be meticulously
planned, provided, cataloged, stored, organized, utilized, maintained,
and, when necessary, upgraded.
The quality improvement program for madrasa education in
Mindanao, the Philippines, typically comprises several components.
First and foremost, standardization of teaching materials and curricula is
crucial, especially in Islamic studies and the Arabic language. Second,
madrasa teachers and administrators should actively engage in academic
activities such as short courses and workshops in educational
management and administration. Third, the Muslim community in
Mindanao should establish a private foundation to raise funds to sustain
madrasa education. Fourth, it is imperative to encourage intelligent
Muslim students from Mindanao to pursue educational scholarships in
various fields of study (Madale, 1988: 359-377). As this quality
improvement program is a long-term endeavor, consistent, staged
actions are necessary.
Conclusion
The present intensive and participatory assistantship program
highlighted two main issues: promoting religious moderation in madrasa
education and improving educational quality. Activities undertaken to
address these issues included focus group discussions (FGD), field
assistantships, seminars, and mentoring forums. These activities were
conducted at three sites: Wisdom Islamic School (WIS) in Davao City,
Eastern Mindanao Islamic Academy (EMIA) in Davao City, and
Mindanao State University (MSU) in General Santos City. The approach
employed in this program was asset-based community development.
The results of this program indicate that (1) Religious moderation in
madrasa education can be strengthened, (2) Professional teachers in
madrasa education can be prepared, and (3) The management of
madrasa education can be enhanced. In general, the outcomes of this
program could contribute to promoting the Indonesian Islamic
education model within the Muslim community in the Philippines. However, given that this program was limited to particular madrasas, it
was evident that there was still significant work to be done by the
Muslim community in Mindanao concerning the quality of madrasa
education, especially in curriculum design and inclusive learning. Hence,
the road to improving madrasa quality in Mindanao is long, and
concrete steps must be taken in stages and consistently
References
Ali, A. P. (2012). The Muslim Educational Needs: An Exposition of the
Fundamental Elements and Objectives of Islamic Education. Mindanao
State University Press.
ALIVE, D. (n.d.). Madrasa Education. Retrieved August 1, 2019, from
http://depedaliveprogram.weebly.com/index.html
Bakar, C. A. (1983). The Islamization of Southern Philippines: An
Overview. In F. L. Jocano (Ed.), Filipino Muslims: Their Social
Institutions and Cultural Achievements (p. 94). University of the
Philippines, Asian Center.
Bakar, C. A. (2011). Mainstreaming Madrasah Education in the
Philippines: Issues, Problems and Challenges. In K. Bustamam-Ahmad & P. Jory (Eds.), Islamic Studies and Islamic Education in
Contemporary Southeast Asia (pp. 75–89). Yayasan Ilmuwan.
Cayamodin, J. R. (2019). The Prospect of Integrated and Holistic
Madrasa Education System in the Philippines: A Sustainable
Approach to Prevent Violent Extremism. Tarbiya: Journal of
Education in Muslim Society, 6(1), 88–102.
http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/tarbiya
Deporos, S. R. C., Komariah, A., & Kurniady, D. A. (2021). WMIP
Model, A Resolution for Traditional Madrasah Teaching and
Operation Implementation in Davao Region. Journal of Educational
Administration Research and Review, 5(2), 165 – 174.
https://doi.org/10.17509/earr.v5i2
Gamon, A. D. (n.d.). Islamization of Education in the Philippines. Retrieved
July 25, 2019, from http://i-epistemology.net/v1/education/98-islamization-of-education-inthe-philippines.html
Hamid, A. H. (2022). Islamic Education and the Development of
Madrasa Schools in the Philippines. International Journal of Political
Studies, 8(2), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.25272/icps.1139650
Hefner, R. W. (2009). Making Modern Muslims the Politics of Islamic
Education in Southeast Asia (R. W. Hefner (ed.)). University of
Hawaii Press.
Isidro, A. (1980). The Moro Problem: An Approach Through Education
Readings in the Philippine Folklore and Functional Literacy. Fourth
National Congress.
Jppn.com. (2010). Filipina Ingin Adopsi Pendidikan Madrasah Indonesia.
https://www.jpnn.com/news/filipina-ingin-adopsi-pendidikan-madrasah-indonesia.
Kulidtod, Z. D. (2017). Islamic Educational Policies in the Philippines:
Its Evolution and Current Problems. International Research-Based
Education Journal, 1(1), 92 – 102.
Latif, S. D. H. (2014). Islamic Education: Opportunities and Challenges
in Secular Philippine State. Saintekbu: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi,
7(1), 70–83.
Lingga, A. S. M. (2004). Muslim Minority in the Philippines. Issues and
Challenges for Peace and Conflict Resolution in Southeast Asia, 1–14.
https://www.islamawareness.net/Asia/Philippines/muslimmin
ority.pdf
Madale, N. (1988). Kebangkitan Kembali Islam dan Nasionalisme di
Filipina. In T. Abdullah & S. Siddique (Eds.), Tradisi dan
Kebangkitan Islam di Asia Tenggara (pp. 359-360,371-377). LP3ES.
Majul, C. A. (1977). The General Nature of Islamic Law and Its Application in
the Philippines.https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/philplj52&div=32&id=&page=
Miller, J. (1982). Religion in the Philippines. Focus on Asian Studies, 2(1),
26–27.
http://www.seasite.niu.edu/tagalog/modules/modules/philippi
nereligions/article_miller.htm
Murtadlo, M. (2015). Islam dan Pendidikan Madrasah di Filipina.
Edukasi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan, 13(1),
45–60.
Noor, F. A., Sikand, Y., & Bruinessen, M. van. (2007). Behind the Walls:
Re-Appraising the Role and Importance of Madrasas in the
World Today. In F. A. Noor, Y. Sikand, & M. van Bruinessen
(Eds.), The Madrasa in Asia: Political Activism and Transnational
Linkage (p. 21). Amsterdam University Press.
Program, D. A. (n.d.). History of Philippine Madrasah Education. Retrieved
August 1, 2019, from
http://depedaliveprogram.weebly.com/history.html
Sali, A. H. A. (2020). Madrasah Education Program Implementation in
the Philippines: An Exploratory Case Study. International Journal of
Comparative Education and Development, 22(3), 201–2017.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-06-2019-0034
Sali, A. H. A. (2021). Posner’s Curriculum Analysis Framework
Towards the Development of Philippine Madrasah Education.
JATI: Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26(1), 163–185.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22452/jati.vol26no1.8
Warsiyah, W., Madrah, M., Muflihin, A., & Irfan, A. (2022). Urgensi
Literasi Digital bagi Pendidik dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan
Mengelola Pembelajaran. Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama untuk
Pemberdayaan, 22(1), 115-132.
doi:https://doi.org/10.21580/dms.2022.221.10042
(Tulisan ini telah dimuat pada DIMAS: Jurnal Pemikiran
Agama dan Pemberdayaan pada edisi, Volume 23,
Nomor 1, ( 2023) dengan judul The Quality Improvement Assistantship Program for
Madrasa Education in Mindanao, the Philippines | Muhlisin | Dimas: Jurnal
Pemikiran Agama untuk Pemberdayaan (walisongo.ac.id)
0 Comments